header-logo header-logo

26 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Zoom witnesses fine for wills

Remotely witnessed wills will be deemed legal due to COVID-19 social distancing requirements, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said

A will must be made ‘in the presence of’ at least two witnesses in order to be valid, in England and Wales. During the pandemic, some people who were shielding or isolating had their wills witnesses remotely used video link software―raising questions about the legal validity.

However, the MoJ has announced that a statutory instrument will be laid in September and will have retrospective effect to 1 January 2020, amending the Wills Act 1837 to stipulate that ‘presence’ may be virtual or physical.  

Nicholas Bevan, senior associate, Solicitors Title, who has previously written in NLJ that witnessing and executing wills online has always been legal therefore there was no need for a rule change, said: ‘The proposed legislation unblocks the logjam caused by the legal profession’s failure to apply the law.

‘Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 does not insist on the physical “presence” of a testamentary witness, any more than it stipulates that “writing” must be handwriting or type.’ He pointed out that the government announcement expressly declares that ‘none of the existing relevant requirements are changed by the new law’.

Welcoming the announcement, Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘Both probate professionals and the public will need greater clarity on when remote witnessing is appropriate and what to do in exceptional circumstances.’

Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) CEO Linda Ford said practitioners had reported ‘significant difficulties with witnessing wills’ and emphasised that the legislation must ‘recognise the risks of duress, undue influence and fraud, and build safeguards into any such new regime.

‘Unfortunately, wills can bring out the worst in people and the retrospective nature of the change, whilst providing additional assurances for those who have already made their wills over the lockdown period, could make some cases particularly fraught.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll