header-logo header-logo

26 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Zoom witnesses fine for wills

Remotely witnessed wills will be deemed legal due to COVID-19 social distancing requirements, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said

A will must be made ‘in the presence of’ at least two witnesses in order to be valid, in England and Wales. During the pandemic, some people who were shielding or isolating had their wills witnesses remotely used video link software―raising questions about the legal validity.

However, the MoJ has announced that a statutory instrument will be laid in September and will have retrospective effect to 1 January 2020, amending the Wills Act 1837 to stipulate that ‘presence’ may be virtual or physical.  

Nicholas Bevan, senior associate, Solicitors Title, who has previously written in NLJ that witnessing and executing wills online has always been legal therefore there was no need for a rule change, said: ‘The proposed legislation unblocks the logjam caused by the legal profession’s failure to apply the law.

‘Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 does not insist on the physical “presence” of a testamentary witness, any more than it stipulates that “writing” must be handwriting or type.’ He pointed out that the government announcement expressly declares that ‘none of the existing relevant requirements are changed by the new law’.

Welcoming the announcement, Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘Both probate professionals and the public will need greater clarity on when remote witnessing is appropriate and what to do in exceptional circumstances.’

Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) CEO Linda Ford said practitioners had reported ‘significant difficulties with witnessing wills’ and emphasised that the legislation must ‘recognise the risks of duress, undue influence and fraud, and build safeguards into any such new regime.

‘Unfortunately, wills can bring out the worst in people and the retrospective nature of the change, whilst providing additional assurances for those who have already made their wills over the lockdown period, could make some cases particularly fraught.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll