header-logo header-logo

22 April 2010 / Victoria Sugden , Paul Castellani
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

At your service?

When can solicitors terminate a contentious retainer & can they claim costs? ask Paul Castellani & Victoria Sugden

The legal framework governing the termination of the solicitor/client relationship in contentious matters (the “entire contract” concept) derives from 19th Century authority. Two recent decisions provide important clarification for a solicitor who wishes to terminate their retainer, particularly as to (i) what constitutes “reasonable grounds” for doing so and (ii) whether, having terminated, the solicitor is entitled to payment of his costs and disbursements up to the date of termination.

Webb v John Macdonald QC

The first case, Webb v John McDonald QC and Another, concerned whether practitioners were obliged to put forward all points asserted by their client, irrespective of merit and whether, in the light of their client’s insistence to put forward such points, it was appropriate to threaten to cease to act. The claimant, Mr Webb, was legally aided in the underlying claim and so special considerations applied to the retainer—but notwithstanding that, points of general principle emerged.

The facts

Mr Webb had been the defendant to a residential possession claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll