header-logo header-logo

12 September 2013 / Stephen Mason
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Is your number up?

Stephen Mason & Nicholas Bohm take issue with the PIN requirements of Santander

Santander UK plc has recently imposed on its UK banking customers the requirement that the personal identity number (PIN) for their accounts must be unique. This is coupled with a prohibition against the recording of the PIN: a combination which we believe places customers in such difficulty that the terms are unfair.

A unique PIN

Clause 9.7(k) of Santander’s General Terms and Conditions Current Accounts and Savings Accounts (effective from 1 January 2013) provides that the customer must “take reasonable steps to keep your PIN or Personal Security Details unique to the accounts that you hold with us”. Although it is not clear what “reasonable steps” the customer must take, the PIN must be unique to the accounts that the customer holds with Santander.

Memory

There is a considerable amount of published research on the topic of memory, and the human need to write down complex passwords (for a general introduction, see Wendy Moncur and Dr Grégory Leplâtre, “PINs, passwords and human memory” Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll