header-logo header-logo

08 October 2013 / Rita D’Alton-Harrison
Categories: Features , Family , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

By your leave

dalton_image

Rita D’Alton-Harrison provides an update on the employment rights of commissioning mothers

Last month, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down two important decisions on the employment rights of commissioning mothers whose children were born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement (see NLJ news story).

Surrogacy can be defined as an arrangement whereby a woman (the surrogate mother) agrees to carry a child for another or others. In such a situation there will be two potential mothers, the surrogate mother who carries the child and the commissioning mother who is intended to be the mother responsible for the nurture and care of the child. While it is recognised in both the UK and Ireland that the surrogate mother is entitled to full maternity rights as the gestational carrier of the child, the law does not provide the same protection for the commissioning mother. This is despite the fact that in some circumstances a commissioning mother could have a biological connection to the child if her ovum were used in treatment.

In the Irish case of Z

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll