header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Brice Dickson
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Year end

Brice Dickson runs through the UK’s top court in 2009

The past year witnessed the demise of the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords and the birth of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

A day before its final sitting (to hear an interlocutory matter) the House issued judgments in seven cases, including R (Purdy) v DPP [2008] UKHL 45, where the DPP was ordered to promulgate a policy identifying the circumstances he would take into account when exercising his discretion to prosecute people for aiding and abetting suicide.

To the 45 decisions by the House can be added the 17 by the new Supreme Court, 11 of which related to matters argued within the House. The annual total of 62 top court decisions compares with the figure of 74 for 2008 and 58 for 2007.

The 62 decisions covered 79 appeals. All but six of these were from courts in England and Wales (even though one involved the constitution of Sark in the Channel Islands: R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9). There were five appeals from Northern

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll