header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The wrong side of the law

Alec Samuels reflects on the pros & cons of a touch of judicial illegality

The claimant has a good legal case, but the defendant points to a touch of illegality on the part of the claimant. Is this fatal to the claim? A claimant cannot be allowed to profit from illegality. The integrity of the legal system must be preserved. The court cannot condone illegality. Allowing one claimant to get away with illegality could encourage others to try to do the same.

However, there may be matters of public policy involving the public interest which will allow or justify the judge in nonetheless not acceding to the illegality defence. The illegality may be outweighed by the public policy.

Trespass

Long term trespass, unlawful illegal tortious trespass, can eventually give rise to acquired legal rights, such as easements, common land rights, even title by adverse possession. As a matter of public policy it is important that we should know our rights, and indeed the rights of others. Land and property should have a title and an owner, so that the land and property may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll