header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Sarah Hughes
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The (W)right approach

nlj_may_8_hughes

When should maintenance payments stop, asks Sarah Hughes

The highly publicised case of Wright v Wright [2015] EWCA Civ 201 has caused a stir following a comment by Lord Justice Pitchford that wives with children aged seven or older should “just get on with it” and go back to work like many other women with children.

This has led to a flurry of enquiries from (typically) ex-husbands asking whether they can stop paying their ex-wives maintenance and force them to go back to work instead.

Wright v Wright

This case involved a wife, Tracey Wright (now aged 51) and her ex-husband, Ian Wright (now aged 59). Mr Wright was an equine surgeon. Mrs Wright had worked prior to the marriage as a legal secretary and administrator but had left work to care for their two children of the marriage, now aged 10 and 16. It was a nine-year marriage.

They divorced in 2008 and the financial order made by District Judge Cushing required Mr Wright to pay joint lives spousal maintenance of £33,200 per annum, and child maintenance of £10,400 per child per annum

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll