header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Sarah Hughes
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The (W)right approach

nlj_may_8_hughes

When should maintenance payments stop, asks Sarah Hughes

The highly publicised case of Wright v Wright [2015] EWCA Civ 201 has caused a stir following a comment by Lord Justice Pitchford that wives with children aged seven or older should “just get on with it” and go back to work like many other women with children.

This has led to a flurry of enquiries from (typically) ex-husbands asking whether they can stop paying their ex-wives maintenance and force them to go back to work instead.

Wright v Wright

This case involved a wife, Tracey Wright (now aged 51) and her ex-husband, Ian Wright (now aged 59). Mr Wright was an equine surgeon. Mrs Wright had worked prior to the marriage as a legal secretary and administrator but had left work to care for their two children of the marriage, now aged 10 and 16. It was a nine-year marriage.

They divorced in 2008 and the financial order made by District Judge Cushing required Mr Wright to pay joint lives spousal maintenance of £33,200 per annum, and child maintenance of £10,400 per child per annum

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll