header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007 / Gerard Forlin
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Opinion , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Worth the wait?

Ten years of wrangling have failed to settle the corporate manslaughter debate, says Gerard Forlin

After more than a decade of wrangling, bartering, debate and delay, the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCHA 2007) finally received Royal Assent on 26 July 2007. It will be brought into force by secondary legislation on 6 April 2008.

It has not previously been possible to pierce the corporate veil and successfully “convict” a large- or medium-sized organisation. With the advent of CMCHA 2007, it is highly likely that such organisations will now be realistically in the telescopic sights of the prosecution agencies after April 2008. In theory, CMCHA 2007 will not change the law regarding the prosecution of individuals (who are increasingly being imprisoned following conviction for manslaughter). The reality is, however, that as police investigations increase, more individuals will be caught up in the process, resulting in more arrests and more convictions.

CMCHA 2007 permits the jury to review the corporate culture inside an organisation and its general attitude to safety enforcement and control for the first time. This new ability for the jury

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll