header-logo header-logo

Workplace censorship: the silent tweetment

122341
Are employers entitled to restrict their employees’ private expression of opinions online or elsewhere? Charles Pigott examines freedom of speech & workplace censorship
  • Gary Lineker’s dispute with the BBC over comments on his personal twitter account raises broader questions about freedom of speech in an employment context.

Most clashes between employers and workers over the use of private social media accounts—at least those that have reached the courts—have concerned comments which either clearly bring the employer into disrepute, or which interfere with the rights of others. What was unusual about the Gary Lineker affair was that he had sought to take part, in a private capacity, in a debate on a matter of considerable public interest—the government’s immigration policy (see ‘The BBC: under (political) pressure?’, NLJ, 7 & 14 April 2023, pp15-16).

Most (though not all) employers don’t have to demonstrate neutrality like the BBC, but will often take a public stance on certain issues of political controversy which they won’t want undermined by the comments of people working for them on social media. Mr Lineker’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll