header-logo header-logo

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Work-life balance matters in-house

In-house lawyers are so overworked that they would sacrifice a fifth of their salary in exchange for a four-day working week.

Two-thirds of 2,882 corporate counsel polled by legal recruiter Laurence Simons said the loss of income (representing about £16,500 of an average £82,500 salary) would be worth the extra day.

They claimed the use of smart phones and other communications technology was blurring the boundaries between work and rest, as their evenings and weekends were taken up with e-mails and other work-related communications. Carriers of smart phones had 13% more e-mails than those without, and spent two-and-a-half times longer checking their correspondence.

Naveen Tuli, managing director of Laurence Simons, said the increase in remote working has created an appetite for a “three-day weekend” because of the amount of work people are required to do outside the office. 

“They also feel technology allows them to work more flexibly, as well as remotely, so the four day week has become more viable and would allow people to fit their work around their interests.”

Tuli says the survey results indicate that people are beginning to feel more secure in their jobs. “Employers now need to look at whether their current employment terms are flexible enough to satisfy this demand,” he adds.

Issue: 7464 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll