header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Mark Warwick
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Words' worth

Investing in bricks and mortar together? Get it in writing says Mark Warwick

* * * * * *

In these uncertain times, if the funds are available, there is much to be said for parties investing in bricks and mortar. Where two or more persons purchase property in their joint names there are cogent reasons why they should set out in writing their intentions regarding their interests in that property. A recent appellate decision, Chopra v Bindra (2009) EWCA Civ 203, [2009] All ER (D) 219 (Mar) shows that, if parties do execute a document recording their intentions, then the courts will strive to give effect to this document, even if the language deployed appears to contravene some settled rule of property law.

Recording interests

The importance of parties recording their agreement as to their interests in jointly owned property in documentary form is best understood by considering the position if they do not do so. At present the state of the law, where there is no trust deed regarding jointly owned property, is uncertain. In Stack v Dowden (2007) UKHL 17, (2007) 2

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll