header-logo header-logo

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Women’s rights at risk

Call for laws on sexual harassment to be strengthened

Misogyny should be made a hate crime, ‘up-skirting’ should be criminalised and protection from pregnancy discrimination should be extended, a panel of legal experts chaired by retired High Court judge Dame Laura Cox has argued in a major report.

The Fawcett Society, an influential charity that campaigns for women’s rights, published its Sex Discrimination Law Review this week. Dame Laura’s panel reviewed the UK’s sex discrimination laws to gauge their effectiveness and the potential risk of erosion of rights post-Brexit.

It concludes that the laws on sexual harassment should be strengthened to protect women from harassment by third parties such as customers or contractors; ‘up-skirting’ (taking photos up women’s skirts) should be made an offence; misogyny should be a hate crime; any breach of a domestic abuse order should be made a criminal offence; and protection from pregnancy discrimination should be extended to six months after maternity leave ends.

Dame Laura said: ‘There is a powerful case for change, to ensure that our sex equality laws are fulfilling their purpose, that employers do more to prevent sex discrimination in the first place, and that working women have access to justice to enforce their rights where they need to.’

The panel found that progress on closing the pay gap has stalled, that a lack of transparency prevents women from challenging unequal pay and legal cases can take many years to resolve. For example, it cited evidence that 54,000 pregnant women and working mothers are pressured to leave their job early each year but just 1% of cases go to tribunal, and women are not protected when they return to work from maternity leave. Moreover, the number of legal centres around the country has halved in ten years, making access to justice more difficult.

Dame Laura added: ‘The evidence we received, of increasing levels of violence, abuse and harassment against women, was deeply disturbing.’

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll