header-logo header-logo

31 March 2022
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Witness intimidation guidelines issued

The Sentencing Council has proposed its first set of guidelines for the offences of perverting the course of justice and witness intimidation

The Sentencing Council has proposed its first set of guidelines for the offences of perverting the course of justice and witness intimidation.

Currently, there are no guidelines for perverting the course of justice and only limited guidance in the magistrates’ courts for witness intimidation. The Council decided not to include perjury, contempt of court and assisting an offender as incidents of these are relatively low (only five people were sentenced for perjury in 2020, 20 for contempt and 40 for assisting an offender).

It proposed sentences ranging from a community order to between two and seven years of custody for perverting the course of justice, depending on levels of harm and culpability. For witness intimidation, it proposed a range from a community order up to four years in prison.

In 2020, about 400 people were sentenced for perverting the course of justice. The common law offence, which is indictable only, currently has a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The offence includes giving false information to police officers at a traffic stop, so avoiding prosecution, to fabricating evidence designed to incriminate an innocent person. 

About 180 people were sentenced in 2020 for witness intimidation, under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, an offence which includes pressuring witnesses to withdraw allegations or witness statements or not to give evidence in court.

Sentencing Council member, Mrs Justice Juliet May said: ‘Perverting the course of justice and witness intimidation are serious offences that strike at the heart of justice: they can delay or even derail criminal investigations; they can cast suspicion on innocent people; and victims and witnesses can feel too scared to make a complaint about a crime they have suffered, or have witnessed.’

The 12-week Sentencing Council consultation, which can be found here, ends on 22 June.
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll