header-logo header-logo

17 January 2014 / Daniel Robinson , Nathaniel Duckworth
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A winning formula

web_duckworthrobinson

Is it now easier for landlords to obtain possession from assured shorthold tenants? Nathaniel Duckworth & Daniel Robinson report

Assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs) were intended to provide landlords with a letting mechanism under which they could recover possession quickly and simply by giving notice, rather than having to establish any of the fault-based grounds for possession, such as the existence of rent arrears. They were a considerable inroad into security of tenure for residential tenants. Since 28 February 1997, the default position has been that any residential tenancy is an AST unless (among other exceptions) the parties expressly agree it is to be an assured tenancy, under which the landlord cannot recover possession simply by giving notice.

Landlords are, however, frequently frustrated by the process of recovering possession from well-advised—or, as many landlords would describe them, obstinate and opportunistic—AST tenants. Even with the accelerated possession procedure—which allows landlords to obtain a possession order without a hearing—it can take weeks to obtain a possession order and a further month or more to obtain a court bailiff’s appointment. In addition, tenants will often raise

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll