header-logo header-logo

19 October 2018
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Windrush reforms reviewed

MPs and Peers on the Joint Committee on Human Rights are to examine proposed Home Office reforms to immigration detention made in response to the Windrush detention scandal.

The Home Office proposals, published this week, include piloting a scheme to manage in the community individuals who would otherwise be detained at Yarl’s Wood Detention Centre, increase use of face-to-face meetings to identify vulnerabilities and resolve potential problems, and reassess its adult at risk policy.

The Home Office has also set up the Windrush Taskforce, which has issued more than 2,300 documents confirming status and enabled more than 2,100 individuals to become British citizens.  

Members of the Windrush generation, who migrated to the UK before 1973, including Anthony Bryan and Paulette Wilson, were wrongly detained and deported due to Home Office errors. Both Bryan and Wilson had indefinite leave to remain in the UK but did not have the correct documents to confirm their status.

Home Secretary Sajid Javid has personally apologised to those affected.

Harriet Harman MP, Chair of the Joint Committee, which will begin its inquiry at the end of this month, said: ‘The wrongful detention of Anthony Bryan and Paulette Wilson were not simply “mistakes” but systemic failures in the system, so the apologies to them from the Home Office in this response to our report were necessary. 

‘Our Committee will closely examine the government’s outlined proposed reforms to the immigration detention system during our upcoming inquiry. For example, we’ll look at the piloting of an automatic bail referral system after two months and the idea of increasing the size and scope of the system for checking detention decisions, and whether these, amongst the other proposals, go far enough to address the current problems in the system.

‘We will also examine the case for time limits on immigration detention and, if indefinite detention is to end, how this should work in practice when we examine the evidence in coming weeks.’

The Home Office has also commissioned an independent review into the scandal, which is due to report back by 31 March 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll