header-logo header-logo

19 January 2018 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills, spills, forgery & other ills

nlj_7777_mcdonnell

It’s a family affair: Constance McDonnell presents a review of key contentious probate cases

  • Testamentary capacity & weight of evidence of a solicitor or other professional who prepared the will.
  • Want of knowledge & approval.
  • Claims by adult children.

Three recent cases in which testamentary capacity was an issue highlight the weight which is likely to be given to the evidence of a solicitor or other professional who prepared the will.

In Edkins v Hopkins [2016] EWHC 2542 (Ch), HHJ Jarman QC sitting in the Cardiff District Registry considered the validity of a will made by a testator (T) three months before his death at the age of 59 due to alcoholic liver damage. The will had been prepared by a solicitor who had many years’ experience of drafting wills and who attended T at home. She did not follow the Golden Rule as she did not feel it was necessary. She did, however, produce a very full attendance note. By the disputed will T gave shares worth £822,000 to his friend Mr Edkins (E), a flat worth £75,000

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll