header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Henrietta Mason , Harriet Gibson , Chris Williams
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

nlj_7799_williams-

Lessons in undue influence & beneficial interests. An update from the courts by Henrietta Mason, Harriet Gibson & Chris Williams

  • The high threshold demanded when trying to demonstrate undue influence.
  • Parties should consider explicit wording to either include or exclude their beneficial interests in a joint account.

In Whitlock v Moree [2017] UKPC 44, Francis Lennard and his friend David Moree opened a joint account at First Caribbean International Bank (Bahamas) Ltd (FCIB) in November 2009. The money ($190,000) was all contributed by Francis. Both men signed an account opening application in FCIB’s standard format which stipulated (clause 20), ‘JOINT TENANCY: Unless otherwise agreed in writing, all money which is now or may later be created to the Account (including all interest) is our joint property with the right of survivorship. That means if one of us dies, all money in the account will automatically become the property of the other account holder(s). In order to make this legally effective, we each assign such money to the other account holder...’.

David was an executor of and beneficiary under Francis’s will. On 18 February

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll