header-logo header-logo

23 June 2020 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate: Beware the beneficiary

23166
When a beneficiary becomes a wolf in sheep’s clothing: Beddoe relief & derivative claims, examined by Constance McDonnell QC
  • Bringing a claim: motivations of a beneficiary v a PR.
  • Roberts v Gill: principles of bringing a claim.
  • Beddoe applications: time to consider the possibility of a derivative claim?

It is not uncommon, indeed probably the norm, for a beneficiary to have stronger motivation than a personal representative to bring a claim on behalf of an estate where that beneficiary has personal knowledge of a perceived wrong done to their deceased relative and/or where the value of that beneficiary’s inheritance would be substantially affected by a successful outcome to the proposed claim. Subject to their resources, the beneficiary may therefore be more likely to be prepared to take up the cudgels on behalf of the estate and to pursue the claim with all necessary resources than an understandably more cautious PR.

Principles

It is now well settled that a beneficiary can bring a derivative claim on behalf of a trust or estate. The applicable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll