header-logo header-logo

07 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Wills claims triple

Disputes over wills have tripled in the past year, partly due to the rise of “DIY” executors and trustees.

There were 368 legal claims against executors in 2013, compared to 107 in the previous year, according to High Court figures. Claims included theft of assets, fraudulent distribution of assets and favouring certain beneficiaries above others.

Law firm Hugh James, which obtained the figures, said the use of family members as “DIY” executors was becoming more common but carried substantial problems. It said executors can be held responsible for errors made in the distribution of assets, can face legal claims from beneficiaries and can be forced to compensate the beneficiary out of their own pocket.

The increase in house prices means there is more at stake, increasing the temptation for dishonest executors. Lay executors have also been caught out purposely misinterpreting the will in order to favour a particular beneficiary.

Matthew Evans, partner at Hugh James, says: “Amateur executors may not want the money of the deceased to go outside of their immediate family and so take matters in their own hands distributing the assets as they see fit, even if that means they are acting contrary to their responsibilities as a legal executor.

“Ignorance of the law can be a stumbling block for lay executors. Mistakes can be made due to inexperience, such as delaying the sale of assets, which can cause a decline in value. In other cases, it’s not just ignorance of the law, but greed that is the problem.”

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll