header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

MENTAL CAPACITY ACT
UNDUE INFLUENCE

CAPACITY TO MAKE A WILL POST-MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005

Scammell v Farmer [2008] EWHC 1100 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 296 (May)

The claimants (C) are the two grandchildren of Irene Scammell who died on 3 July 2003. They challenged the validity of her last will made in early 2003 on the basis of lack of capacity, lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence. Mrs Scammell’s daughter, the defendant (D), was the sole beneficiary of the will to the exclusion of C. Mrs Scammell had executed an earlier will leaving her property to C in equal shares and the remainder of her estate to be divided between D and a third party.

The earlier will, and all copies of it, had been destroyed by D after Mrs Scammell’s death. As a result Mr Stephen Smith QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, approached D’s evidence with caution.

Despite a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer’s in September 2001, the judge held that Mrs Scammell had testamentary capacity when she signed the will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll