header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Willpower

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate update

In Burgess & Burgess v Hawes [2012] WTLR 423, Mrs Burgess (B) prepared a will on 23 September 1996 leaving her estate equally between her three children, Julia (J), Peter (P) and Libby (L). On 20 December 2006, after an argument between J and P, J took B to a solicitor to prepare a new will which would leave her estate to J and L alone. On 27 December 2006, B had a fall. On 12 January 2007, J took B to see the solicitor and B signed a will excluding P. In April 2007, B opened a joint account with J, into which she paid a significant portion of her savings and her pension. On 23 November 2007, B suffered a stroke. A CAT scan showed signs of previous damage to the brain, which were likely to have resulted from a previous stroke. B died on 30 May 2009.

L (despite taking more under the 2007 will than the 1996 will) and P sought to challenge the validity of the 2007 will on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll