header-logo header-logo

29 April 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Widow’s peak

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

“Life must be lived forwards, but can only be understood backwards.”

This update deals with two recent decisions under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act), both of which were brought by widows who were unsuccessful in their claims.

Kebbeh v Farmer

Kebbeh v Farmer [2015] EWHC 3827 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 257 (Dec) addressed the question of domicile in a spouse 1975 Act claim.

Malcolm Mitchell had a domicile of origin in England, where he was married and had two daughters. By 1994 this marriage had been dissolved and he was based primarily in Gambia.

In 1999 he met the claimant, Haddy Kebbeh, a Gambian citizen 30 years his junior. They married in a Muslim ceremony in 2000 and Mitchell’s third child, Jennifer, was born in England in 2001. There were difficulties in the marriage from a relatively early stage. On 5 May 2006 Mr Mitchell made a will leaving his residuary estate to be divided equally between his three daughters and making no provision for the claimant.

Mitchell

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll