header-logo header-logo

23 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Why Pre-action Protocol Number 13 is bad news for creditors

nlj_7782_thompson

Pre-action Protocol Number 13 ‘must be the biggest turn-off for creditors since the Grayling hike in court fees’, Peter Thompson QC, general editor, Civil Court Practice (The Green Book), writes in this week’s NLJ.

Thompson says the protocol adds to the administrative burden for creditors, creating extra hurdles before they can go to court, and could act as a deterrent to some, Thompson says. For example, it requires creditors to produce an extra 10 pages of documents including an information sheet, response form and statement of income and expenditure, and builds an extra 30 days response time.

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll