header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / John Martin
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Whose land is it anyway?

225828
Agricultural archives are a valuable (but neglected) resource for resolving access rights, writes Professor John Martin
  • Resolving land access disputes often hinges on overlooked historical records, such as the National Farm Survey and War Agricultural Executive Committee files.
  • Second world war-era surveys and committee documents offer detailed insights into land use, ownership and farm conditions, with many now accessible via the National Archives.

Investigating access disputes, together with a multitude of other rights and obligations regarding agricultural land, can be problematic, given the paucity of verifiable archival material that appears to be available. This is often compounded by the prevalence of what are often rather vague and contradictory ingrained verbal recollections. For those faced with the challenge of investigating agricultural disputes, a number of often largely neglected documentary sources can be accessed. These include the National Farm Survey 1941–43 and the records of the War Agricultural Committees, which directed the food production campaign in the second world war. There are also a wide range of relevant papers in county record offices and the Museum of English Rural

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll