header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 April 2007 / Lindy Golding , Penelope Thornton
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Whose format is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Are television rights protectable in the UK? Lindy Golding and Penelope Thornton report

Copyright does not protect general ideas but the expression of ideas (see Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2001] FSR 11, [2001] 1 All ER 700). However, in IPC Media Ltd v Highbury-SPL Publishing Ltd [2004] EWHC 2985 (Ch), [2004] All ER (D) 342 (Dec) Mr Justice Laddie recognised the difficulty in  defining the boundary between the taking of general ideas and concepts and copying in the copyright sense.

Copyright protection for television programmes hit the news in November 2005 with the high-profile case brought by Simon Fuller's 19 TV against FremantleMedia Ltd, Simco Ltd, Syco Ltd and Simon Cowell. It involved a dispute about the music talent shows Pop Idol and The X Factor. However, the case settled without any further judicial guidance.

Spotlight on privacy

The rise in the popularity of reality television programmes has turned the spotlight on format piracy. In April 2000 the Format Recognition and Protection Association (FRAPA) was formed by international industry figures to combat the problem. According

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll