header-logo header-logo

06 October 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Who should pay for social care nursing?

When nursing care is provided in a social care context, who foots the bill? Nicholas Dobson looks at the Supreme Court case of Forge Care Homes

  • In the context of social care, nursing care by an NHS nurse covers care which in all the circumstances ought to be provided by a registered nurse because it is ‘ancillary to or closely connected with or part and parcel of the nursing care which she has to provide’.

We know that NHS services are generally free at the point of delivery. Social care, on the other hand, is local authority-funded and subject to client means-testing. But what if nursing care is provided in a predominantly social care context? Who pays and for what? It was this scenario that the Supreme Court had to tackle on 2 August 2017 in R (Forge Care Homes Ltd and others) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and others [2017] UKSC 56. Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which Lords Clake, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge agreed.

Background

As Lady Hale indicated, the ‘case is about who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll