header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021 / John Gould
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Profession , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Who reviews the reviewers?

44735
Comparing the market: John Gould considers the hidden perils of online review sites for the legal profession
  • Despite research suggesting that consumers have little belief in the usefulness and credibility of reviews posted online, seven web platforms have nonetheless been selected for a pilot of review sites, with solicitors encouraged to engage with them.

When it comes to the legal services market, the work of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) over the last few years feels like a solution in search of a problem. In 2016, the CMA prodded legal regulators into price transparency rules. This was based on the fanciful notion that consumers would benefit from reading thousands of words on a number of solicitors’ websites describing hypothetical prices, rather than make a few phone calls to get actual quotes.

Although the CMA’s recent review of progress maintains a cheerful tone, the only progress seems to be that the regulators have managed, to some extent, to do what the CMA wanted. The result is that price comparison information is now more opaque, and an opportunity has been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll