header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Who killed Alexander Litvinenko?

web_flannery

Louis Flannery examines the implications of the latest ruling in relation to the Litvinenko affair

Few reading this will fail to recall the well-publicised circumstances of Mr Litvinenko’s death from radiation poisoning in London in late 2006. The conspiracy theories still abound, but the prime suspects, in respect of whom arrest warrants and extradition requests were made, are Russian agents who remain at large in Moscow.

 

Mr Litvinenko himself had spent more than 18 years in the KGB, before turning whistleblower and having to flee Russia in 2000. He had fallen out with his paymasters in 1998, after declaring publicly that he had been ordered by the Kremlin to assassinate the late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who fled from Russia in 1999. (The media magnate was found dead in the bathroom of his Berkshire mansion last year, apparently from suicide, following his loss in the mammoth Commercial Court trial against Abramovich (see “Rich Pickings” Pt I & Pt II)

The inquest

A week after Mr Litvinenko passed away, an inquest began into the cause of death. It was quickly adjourned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll