header-logo header-logo

18 August 2016 / Bill Davies
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Who in corporate law is my neighbour?

Tortious claims against parent companies examined by Bill Davies

  • Parent companies domiciled in the UK are increasingly likely to face litigation in the UK courts due to the activities of foreign subsidiaries.
  • Separate legal personality and limited liability no defence from traditional principles of tort liability.
  • Recent case law indicates that arguments of forum non conveniens are ineffective in this context.

The recent judgment in the case of Lungowe and others v Vedanta Resources PLC and another [2016] EWHC 975 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 60 (Jun) is illuminating regarding the potential liability in tort that a parent company in the UK can incur as the result of the activities of a subsidiary domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction. Although the hearing itself was an interlocutory application relating to where the substantive claims should be tried; the dismissal of the applications by Mr Justice Coulson and his reasoning in allowing the litigation to continue in the courts of England and Wales are indicative of the potential ambit of tort claims against parent companies domiciled in the UK.

Tort claims against parent companies

Multinational

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll