header-logo header-logo

23 September 2016 / Peter Breakey
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistleblowing protection

nlj_7715_breakey

Peter Breakey heralds a small but welcome extension to the scope of protection for whistleblowers

  • A claimant’s status as a worker vis à vis an agency they are employed under is irrelevant to a claim against a trust that the worker provides services for.

The rules designed to protect whistleblowers have repeatedly proved to be inadequate. A recent decision in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), which will apply to many NHS agency workers, provides a small but welcome extension of their scope. In McTigue v University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0354/15/JOJ, Ms McTigue (the claimant) was a nurse employed by an agency (the agency) which provided services to the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (the trust). From 2011, she had been working with victims of sexual assaults. In 2013 she was removed from this work. She argued that her removal from this work was a detriment which she had suffered as a result of a protected disclosure she had made to the trust. It was therefore a breach of her right under s 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).

At

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll