header-logo header-logo

25 June 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7938 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistleblowing: eyes on the prize?

51885
Is it time for the UK to consider financial rewards for whistleblowers? John Bowers QC weighs up the pros & cons
  • Offering monetary rewards to those who blow the whistle, as in the US, has thus far had a lukewarm reception in the UK, with concerns surrounding motivations and increased antagonism.
  • However, it is clearly desirable—both morally and economically—to encourage whistleblowers to come forward, and the possibility of reward may provide more of a reason to do so.

Bradley C Birkenfeld, a former banker at UBS, served two and a half years in prison for conspiring with a wealthy California developer to evade United States income taxes. He was convicted of fraud for withholding crucial information from federal investigators, including details of his top client, the property developer Igor Olenicoff.

Yet, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) made Birkenfeld’s post-prison life just a little bit easier by granting him in 2012 a reward of $104m for whistleblowing—not for blowing the whistle on his own activities, but by divulging the schemes that UBS used to encourage American citizens to dodge their taxes.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll