header-logo header-logo

31 October 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination , Profession , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail

Whistle while you work

Nicholas Dobson analyses the recent decision extending protection to those who blow the whistle while on the Bench
  • To comply with Convention rights, the Employment Rights Act 1996 should be read and effected to extend its whistle-blowing protection to judicial office-holders.

Many may still see judges as rather like W.S. Gilbert’s Lord Chancellor. For, as he intoned in Iolanthe: ‘The Law is the true embodiment/Of everything that’s excellent. It has no kind of fault or flaw/And I, my Lords, embody the Law.’

But while Gilbert’s satire may once have contained a generous grain of truth, modern judges are more likely to be working unremittingly and stressfully hard in imperfect conditions and with inadequate support. And, although this may surprise many, judges are in fact human and can suffer serious workplace detriments. But while ‘workers’ benefit from whistle-blowing protection (for, among other things, breach of legal obligations or danger to health and safety under Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996)), this has not been extended to judges.

That was until 16 October

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll