header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistle-blowing set to soar in the City

Employment

Employment lawyers are predicting a rise in City workers bringing claims against their employers for breaching whistle-blower protection laws.

The number of employees claiming they have been sacked or disciplined for blowing the whistle on malpractice at work has soared in the last few years and is likely to rise further because of the economic downturn, says Jon Taylor, head of employment law at EMW Picton Howell.

Employment tribunals can award unlimited damages for breaches of whistle-blower protection laws, whereas unfair dismissal claims are capped. According to government figures, the number of tribunal cases where employees claimed to have been penalised for whistle-blowing rose 31% last year to 1,356 cases. Taylor says: “In the last two years we have seen the number of whistle-blowing claims almost triple.

“The reputational, as well as the financial, costs of such a claim could be disastrous for companies. We should see an increase in cases where City workers claim to have blown the whistle on irresponsible or unlawful sales, trading or risk management activities.

“However, whistle-blowing is not solely limited to cases of financial irregularity or criminal offences, as many people think. The scope of the legislation is so wide that it can encompass a huge range of ‘offences’. For example, staff can report employers for breach of any legal obligation, which could include breach of contract for failing to pay a bonus or breach of health and safety or harassment laws for failure to protect an employee who reports stress or bullying.”

Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll