header-logo header-logo

15 February 2018
Issue: 7781 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash reforms divisive

Small claims limit for RTAs set to be raised to £5,000

Controversial whiplash reforms could come in as early as April next year, ministry officials have confirmed to solicitors.

The Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) has revealed ministers confirmed at a meeting this week that they plan to introduce tariffs for soft tissue or whiplash injuries in April 2019. The plan is dependent on the Civil Liability Bill progressing through Parliament in time.

The small claims limit for road traffic accident cases would be raised from £1,000 to £5,000 via secondary legislation at the same time. MASS say most claimants would not then be able to access legal representation, as costs cannot be recovered in the small claims court.

Simon Stanfield, chair of MASS, said MASS would fight the plans but warned that, if approved, there were ‘still huge questions about how it would be implemented, operated and how the worst consequences can be limited. There is an enormous amount for the government to sort out if it is to hit its April 2019 target date’.

Patrick Allen, senior partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, described the reforms as ‘misconceived’.

‘The reforms will put significant impediments in the way of claimants seeking justice for smaller personal injury claims and would appear to be caught by the Supreme Court’s statement in last July’s Unison case that, without unimpeded access to justice, the democratic process was in danger of becoming “a meaningless charade”,’ he said.

‘Therefore, the government may struggle to persuade Parliament or the courts that the proposed reforms are lawful.’

However, insurance lawyer Deborah Newberry, head of public affairs at Kennedys, welcomed the news.

‘For compensators, including insurers, the uncertainty around the Civil Liability Bill has understandably been a source of considerable frustration—compounded by the uncertainty around the domestic reform agenda more broadly and the UK’s exit from the EU.’

Issue: 7781 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll