header-logo header-logo

Whiplash: delayed again

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Reforms to whiplash claims have been postponed again, this time to May 2021, because of the impact of the pandemic on the insurance, legal and medical sectors

In a written statement this week, the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said the government remained ‘firmly committed’ to the measures, which include raising the small claims track limit to £5,000 for road traffic injury cases, banning offers to settle prior to a medical report and introducing tariffs for claims. Last year, the Lord Chancellor delayed the reforms to April 2021.

Ian Davies, head of motor at insurance law firm Kennedys, said the additional delay was ‘sensible’.

‘All parties, be they lay claimant’s, claimant lawyers, insurers, claims handling companies or defendant law firms, will need at least three months to update and amend their systems to accommodate the new rules,’ he said.

‘What is urgently required are the rules themselves. The delay should not delay the release of the rules, the more time all parties have to consider the rules and implement system changes will make for a smoother implementation for all.’

Nigel Teasdale, past-president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) and partner at DWF, said he believed the rules were likely to be published at the end of January or early February as the Civil Procedure Rules Committee have a meeting scheduled for 5 February, which would give the three-month period of preparation previously requested by all parts of the industry.

He said the delay was ‘not as long as some had predicted’.

Sam Elsby, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) said: ‘Work on the new system has been dangerously compressed to meet this artificial deadline, so we welcome any delay which is used to address our concerns about outstanding issues of critical importance to injured people.

‘We need to know exactly how the proposed new “bespoke” court process will replace ADR (alternative dispute resolution); we need to know the outcome of consultation with the Lord Chief Justice about the new whiplash tariffs, and there needs to be clarification about how mixed claims will be handled in the new system.’

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll