header-logo header-logo

20 September 2024 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Where Next for equal pay?

189732
The ruling in the group action against the retailer paves the way for more claimants in the retail sector & beyond, writes Charles Pigott
  • Last month’s employment tribunal decision in the Next equal pay litigation is the first substantive ruling to emerge from six separate group actions being brought against national retailers, including Asda and Tesco.

After years of interlocutory hearings, it had been established that the work done by predominantly female store workers was of equal value to that done by their comparators, who worked in Next’s warehouses where a majority of the workers are male. The final stage was reached earlier this year, when a 15-day hearing took place to hear Next’s material factor defence in relation to 17 groups of terms. The reserved decision has now been published (Thandi and others v Next Retail Ltd and Next Distribution Ltd Leeds ET 1302019/18 and others). There are now over 3,500 claimants in this group action.

Next has indicated that it intends to appeal.

The material factor defence

It is not enough for claimants to show

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll