header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Where men are not equal

istock_000016028943medium_4

Michael Nash reports on a new Bill which aims to end an anomaly over the male partners of peers

Surprising as it may seem, there is a legal area where men are not equal. The wish to rectify this was the object of The Honours (Equality of Titles for Partners) Bill, introduced into the House of Commons in July by the Conservative MP Oliver Colville. It sought to remedy a curious, but ancient, lacuna in the law of this country, whereby although women share their husband’s rank and status, husbands do not share that of their wives. This ranges from the sovereign downwards, and is clearly at odds with the present laws of equality and equal treatment, and even with human rights legislation. The Bill also covers civil partners.

Under the current system women take the “same rank as their husbands or as their brothers; but the daughter of a peer marrying a commoner retains her rank as Lady or Honourable”. Merely official rank on the husband’s part does not give any similar precedence to a wife. No rank held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll