header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Where men are not equal

istock_000016028943medium_4

Michael Nash reports on a new Bill which aims to end an anomaly over the male partners of peers

Surprising as it may seem, there is a legal area where men are not equal. The wish to rectify this was the object of The Honours (Equality of Titles for Partners) Bill, introduced into the House of Commons in July by the Conservative MP Oliver Colville. It sought to remedy a curious, but ancient, lacuna in the law of this country, whereby although women share their husband’s rank and status, husbands do not share that of their wives. This ranges from the sovereign downwards, and is clearly at odds with the present laws of equality and equal treatment, and even with human rights legislation. The Bill also covers civil partners.

Under the current system women take the “same rank as their husbands or as their brothers; but the daughter of a peer marrying a commoner retains her rank as Lady or Honourable”. Merely official rank on the husband’s part does not give any similar precedence to a wife. No rank held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll