header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Where men are not equal

istock_000016028943medium_4

Michael Nash reports on a new Bill which aims to end an anomaly over the male partners of peers

Surprising as it may seem, there is a legal area where men are not equal. The wish to rectify this was the object of The Honours (Equality of Titles for Partners) Bill, introduced into the House of Commons in July by the Conservative MP Oliver Colville. It sought to remedy a curious, but ancient, lacuna in the law of this country, whereby although women share their husband’s rank and status, husbands do not share that of their wives. This ranges from the sovereign downwards, and is clearly at odds with the present laws of equality and equal treatment, and even with human rights legislation. The Bill also covers civil partners.

Under the current system women take the “same rank as their husbands or as their brothers; but the daughter of a peer marrying a commoner retains her rank as Lady or Honourable”. Merely official rank on the husband’s part does not give any similar precedence to a wife. No rank held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll