header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Gerard Mcdermott KC
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

When in Rome...

Gerard McDermott QC revisits Rome II, considering Homawoo & the opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi

The number of accidents involving people who are injured while working or on holiday abroad is, inevitably, on the increase. Practitioners in this field are all alert to the issues as to the importance of identifying the applicable law in this regard. In the most serious of cases, such as those involving victims who suffer a spinal cord injury or a serious head injury, the determination of whether, for instance, the law of Spain or the law of England and Wales applies may mean a difference of well over £1m in terms of assessment of their future loss.

Rome II

In any case where the accident overseas occurs after 11 January 2009 then the provisions of Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II) will govern the choice of law to be used by any court within the EU determining either liability or damages in a cross border tort claim. Particularly, in terms of the question of determination of damages this is a significant change from the previous law in England

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll