header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010 / James Stanbury , Mark Jennings
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

When the dust settles

James Stanbury & Mark Jennings examine ash cloud liability & losses

The eruption of Eyjafjallajokull in April and ensuing airspace restrictions has caused well-reported disruption and financial losses to the aviation industry.

The recent slowdown in the ferocity of the eruption coupled with relaxation of the maximum permissible volcanic ash concentrations has resulted in a return to “normal” services. Now that the dust has settled, it is interesting to analyse not only what recovery options have been suggested as available to airlines but also how such losses may be calculated.

A business interruption policy that may have been bought by an airline, unless there are specific extensions, will normally only respond when there is physical damage. Thankfully, the volcanic ash did not result in such damage but did in airspace restrictions due to obvious concerns and thus, insurers have not been obliged to pay on losses that have been incurred.

This is also the situation for passengers who are also generally unable to recover costs from personal travel insurance policies as the “extraordinary circumstances” exclusion would tend to apply. However, passengers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll