header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

What’s in a name?

nlj_7776_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt explores the weird world of what exactly you can trade mark

Many of us who grew up watching Blue Peter will be able to remember the bafflement we felt when its presenters would routinely use the phrase ‘sticky-backed plastic’ when referring to Sellotape. Why did they call it that when no-one else in the world seemed to? We now know of course that the reason was to do with the BBC’s policy of not mentioning brand names on air; ‘Sellotape’, much like ‘Hoover’, was an example of a brand name or trade mark becoming practically synonymous with the product, much to the chagrin of their rivals no doubt.

Trade marks are everywhere these days, and their value, as well as the complexity of their registration and their protection, is big business. But what can you trade mark?

Surprises & restrictions

Many words that we use in everyday speech and writing are trade marks. Surprising examples that are or have been trade marks include ‘aspirin’ (a trade mark of Bayer), ‘escalator’ (a trade mark of the Otis Elevator Company), ‘cats-eyes’ (a trade mark

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll