header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What’s mine is mine...

Ed Heaton explores the rights of cohabitants

In her recently published article in NLJ, Geraldine Morris considered the approach of the courts to periods of cohabitation within the context of divorce proceedings (both cohabitation between the parties prior to their marriage and the cohabitation of one of the parties with a third party post separation). This article will look at the stark contrast between the positions of cohabitants upon separation and those of spouses upon divorce.

In her article, Ms Morris referred to the case of GW v RW [2003] 2 FCR 289, [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May). In his judgment in that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differently. In practice, therefore, any period of pre-marital cohabitation is likely to be added to the term of a marriage for the purposes of measuring the length of the marriage, something which is often relevant to determining fairness within the context of a divorce.

Claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll