header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What’s mine is mine...

Ed Heaton explores the rights of cohabitants

In her recently published article in NLJ, Geraldine Morris considered the approach of the courts to periods of cohabitation within the context of divorce proceedings (both cohabitation between the parties prior to their marriage and the cohabitation of one of the parties with a third party post separation). This article will look at the stark contrast between the positions of cohabitants upon separation and those of spouses upon divorce.

In her article, Ms Morris referred to the case of GW v RW [2003] 2 FCR 289, [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May). In his judgment in that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differently. In practice, therefore, any period of pre-marital cohabitation is likely to be added to the term of a marriage for the purposes of measuring the length of the marriage, something which is often relevant to determining fairness within the context of a divorce.

Claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll