header-logo header-logo

What’s in a WhatsApp message?

252778
© Getty images

Professor Sukhninder Panesar ponders the legal enforceability of electronic communications between separating couples

  • Covers the recent family law case of Reid Roberts v Mei Lin, concerning the legal effect of intentions expressed through WhatsApp and email.

In an age of digital communication and messaging, it is common for individuals to communicate with each other using platforms such as email, WhatsApp and Messenger. Most daily communications between people are through digital messages. Whether such messages amount to a formal expression of intention or indeed hold any legal significance is another matter.

In this context, it was only going to be a matter of time before the English courts would have to decide upon the question of the enforceability and effect of a WhatsApp message on an agreement to transfer an interest in property. That opportunity to decide arose in a recent High Court decision before Mr Justice Cawson in Reid-Roberts v Mei Lin [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch).

The case involved a separation between a married couple who had deliberated over the ownership of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll