header-logo header-logo

04 March 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

What next?

The government consultation period on the Jackson reform proposals has now closed. Next we will have a response in perhaps May or June and then draft legislation with implementation next year. Or will we?

Government thinking has overtaken the Jackson juggernaut, says Dominic Regan

The government consultation period on the Jackson reform proposals has now closed. Next we will have a response in perhaps May or June and then draft legislation with implementation next year. Or will we?

It is beyond doubt that things will change with a view to reducing the costs of litigation. No one seems to have a bad word to say about allowing contingency fees and I think it certain that they will be introduced. Primary legislation is needed.

Referral fees are still being bitterly debated. Sir Rupert recommended that they be banned. The government last summer appeared to prevaricate and one senior civil servant told me that if solicitors wanted to throw money at buying work then so be it.

Jackson returned to the fray in his November speech

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll