header-logo header-logo

What might have been…

05 March 2015 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan reflects on the Jackson reforms

"Oh what's the bloody point?". The last words recorded in the diary of the sad comedian Kenneth Williams before he swallowed an overdose might well be ruefully uttered now by Sir Rupert Jackson. 

It will be remembered that his brief was to propose reforms that would enable justice to be secured at proportionate cost. An unholy combination of circumstances seem to have thwarted his aims.

Control

Sir Rupert recommended that court fees should be kept under control. These words have been conveniently ignored by the Ministry of Justice. Recent changes will propel some fees up by 622% at one level and others would rise by over 400%. These cretinous changes will either make litigation dramatically more expensive or will deter those with viable claims from ever pursuing them. Either way, a Jackson tenet will be frustrated. It is shameful. 

Fast-track litigation, some injury apart, still lacks a predictable costs regime. Jackson privately pushed to have this implemented ahead of his overall package of changes. He

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll