header-logo header-logo

26 March 2019 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What lies beneath

Matthew Hoe considers if Roman v AXA Insurance is the tip of the preservation of costs’ iceberg

  • Roman v AXA Insurance: is it always possible to preserve rights to costs after a personal injury claim has moved from one firm to another?

 It’s a time of upheaval and market consolidation. Personal injury claims often move from one firm to another. Firms should be on the lookout to preserve rights to costs, but the recent case of Roman v AXA Insurance (13 December 2018, County Court at Central London) might be the tip of the iceberg in showing that isn’t always achieved.

There is doubtless a raft of reasons why solicitors may cease to act. For one, the 2013 reforms gradually prompted several firms to make a commercial decision to leave the personal injury market. But those file moves were happening long before 2013, and in costs assessments they were not probed too hard. It was moves that straddled the 2013 reforms which increased the focus. Paying parties were perturbed that the new solicitors for receiving parties sought to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll