header-logo header-logo

04 December 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What lies beneath

Salaried partners are likely to cause problems when converting to LLPs, says Simon Young

After nearly a decade of experience of the process of converting traditional partnerships to limited liability partnerships (LLPs), it has become apparent that there is one significant group of people who are likely to cause more problems than any other.

This is not because they wish to be awkward, or because the firm’s management are approaching things wrongly, but because the very nature of their position causes difficulties. They are salaried partners.

The concept of holding out

The root of the problem, which all concerned are often reluctant to admit, is that the concept of salaried partners is a lie! A lie sanctioned by regulations, recognised implicitly by statute, and endorsed by widespread usage over centuries, but nonetheless a lie.

Those people involved are held out to the world as something they are not, and the very point of this being done is to create a belief in third parties which the firm and the individuals know is not true, namely that they are actually partners. It is difficult to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll