header-logo header-logo

What lies beneath

04 December 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Salaried partners are likely to cause problems when converting to LLPs, says Simon Young

After nearly a decade of experience of the process of converting traditional partnerships to limited liability partnerships (LLPs), it has become apparent that there is one significant group of people who are likely to cause more problems than any other.

This is not because they wish to be awkward, or because the firm’s management are approaching things wrongly, but because the very nature of their position causes difficulties. They are salaried partners.

The concept of holding out

The root of the problem, which all concerned are often reluctant to admit, is that the concept of salaried partners is a lie! A lie sanctioned by regulations, recognised implicitly by statute, and endorsed by widespread usage over centuries, but nonetheless a lie.

Those people involved are held out to the world as something they are not, and the very point of this being done is to create a belief in third parties which the firm and the individuals know is not true, namely that they are actually partners. It is difficult to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll