header-logo header-logo

20 September 2016
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

What drives lateral hires?

Culture rather than compensation entices City partners away from their firms, new research has shown.

A mere 15% of partners who switched firms were motivated by money, according to an online survey by legal search firm Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA). Instead, more than three out of five said culture was the strongest factor attracting them to their new firm.

MLA’s inaugural London Lateral Partner Survey is based on the responses of 176 City law firm partners who changed firm in the past five years. Of those who selected culture as their reason for moving, two-thirds said diversity and inclusion played an important role in their decision. This was especially true for women—61% selected diversity as a key driver, compared to 21% of men.

Brent Harris, executive director, international operations of MLA, says: “Law firms should take note that prospective laterals are swayed more by leadership opportunities and cultural incentives than financial gain.” 

The key reasons given for leaving a firm were poor leadership and management.

Nearly 60% of lateral hires resulted in either new clients or the transfer of some of the new partner’s existing clients, and one third resulted in an increase in both.

Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll