header-logo header-logo

What difference does 25 years make? The Arbitration Act 1996 in 2022

74297
Does the Arbitration Act require amendment? Shantanu Majumdar QC assesses what works and what could be improved
  • Reviews the practical operation of the Act, and looks at Law Commission proposals for amendment.

In late 2021, the Law Commission announced that it is to review the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act). It is no coincidence that the Act came into force 25 years ago in January; on any view it is high time to consider how well it is now working.

It emerged from a long and complicated period which included a false legislative start. Perhaps the most important aspect of that history was the 1989 decision by the Mustill Committee to recommend that the 1985 UNCITRAL Model should not be adopted in England and Wales. The Model Law intended to promote the harmonisation of the laws applicable to international commercial arbitration and one reason for the committee’s rejection was that ‘the majority of trading nations, and more notably those to which international arbitrations have tended to gravitate’ had not adopted it. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll