header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Welfare warfare

child_welfare_4

Jonathan Herring discusses the nature of child welfare

The Court of Appeal judgment in Re G (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1233, [2012] All ER (D) 50 (Oct) is a tour de force. It provides an analysis of the welfare principle of considerable erudition. Aristotle, Orthodox Judaism and notions of 21st century parenting are all covered.

The case involved five children of an ultra-orthodox Jewish family. The parents had separated and disagreed over whom the children should live with and their religious education.

The nature of welfare

It is surprising that the notions of welfare and best interests have been little analysed by the courts. What is beneficial for someone, or what makes for a good life, can be controversial. Looking around your friends, you will probably quickly spot a range of ways people seek to pursue their vision of the good life. Whether it is seeking riches, achievement, virtue or love; we all have our goals we strive for. Yet which of these, or more realistically what combinations of these, should we seek for children or those lacking capacity? Munby LJ

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll