header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Welcome to the party

How will third party funding affect the legal landscape? Jonathan Wheeler and Felicity Potter consider the possibilities

Third party funding enables claimants who have a reasonably strong case to bring litigation they would otherwise be unable to bring and so promotes access to justice. It is also potentially an attractive tool for corporates who can afford to litigate but who do not want to incur any of the costs or risks associated with litigation. Anecdotally, however, it seems that few corporates have expressed a serious interest in litigation funding, mainly due to its high cost in terms of recoveries which would have to be given up to the funder in the event of success.

The third party funding market is still a young market and advisers and funders alike are feeling their way. Funders are generally interested in large commercial disputes and will only fund cases where there is a high prospect of success. The funding process can be lengthy because the funder will wish to scrutinise closely the merits of the case and, consequently, arrangements can take time, particularly if adverse costs cover is also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll